Smart BuildingActive
Smart Building Platform
A sensor-rich building designed for data-driven decisions.
Case study
Problem
Smart buildings are usually a collection of isolated devices. We wanted one coherent system where the building is observable, controllable, and capable of improving over time without turning into a fragile demo.
Constraints
- •Real building, real people, real uptime expectations
- •Hardware heterogeneity (different vendors, protocols, generations)
- •Installations evolve during construction and keep changing afterwards
- •Must remain explainable: no “magic automations” nobody understands
Approach
- •Treat the building like a system-of-systems with clear boundaries
- •Standardize data ingestion and normalize signals early
- •Make observability a first-class feature (logs, metrics, “why did this happen?”)
- •Design the experience: interactions must feel coherent for guests
Architecture
- •Device layer: sensors + actuators (lights, doors, feedback LEDs, screens)
- •Integration layer: protocol bridges + adapters per subsystem
- •Data layer: structured events + time-series where it matters
- •App layer: One unified app for control, monitoring, and automation
Outcomes
- •A living proof-of-concept office (House of the Future)
- •Unified control and visibility across many subsystems
- •A platform mindset: built to evolve over years, not weeks
Lessons learned
- •Reliability is UX. If it fails silently, trust collapses.
- •Naming, structure and conventions beat cleverness every time.
- •The best 'magic' is disciplined engineering underneath.
Note: Some details are intentionally kept high-level due to ongoing work and confidentiality.
Highlights
- •Real building, real sensors, real constraints
- •Data pipelines → dashboards → long-term insights
- •Built for years, not demos
Next step
Want to build something like this — or pressure test your architecture?