AIActive
AI Applications for the Real World
AI that supports decisions instead of chasing hype.
Case study
Problem
AI is easy to demo and hard to trust. I focus on AI features that actually help people make decisions or automate safe tasks — with clear boundaries, fallbacks and observability.
Constraints
- •Inputs are messy: incomplete data, ambiguity, and humans changing their mind
- •AI outputs must be safe to act on (or clearly marked as suggestions)
- •Latency and cost matter in real products
- •Failure must degrade gracefully — not quietly do the wrong thing
Approach
- •Use AI where it's strongest: classification, extraction, summarization, reasoning support
- •Keep deterministic systems deterministic; AI is an assistant, not the foundation
- •Design for uncertainty: confidence, guardrails, and escalation paths
- •Instrument everything: traces, evaluation sets, feedback loops, regression checks
Architecture
- •Pipeline: input → normalization → AI step(s) → validation → action/suggestion
- •Guardrails: schema validation, allowlists, rate limits, and safe defaults
- •Observability: logs + metrics per step, plus 'why did it decide this?' context
- •Iteration: small deployable improvements, monitored over time
Outcomes
- •AI features that feel helpful instead of risky
- •Systems that can be monitored, tested and improved continuously
- •A reusable approach for adding AI into products without losing trust
Lessons learned
- •If it can't be tested and observed, it's not done
- •Guardrails aren't optional — they are the product
- •The best AI UX is calm: clear, bounded, and honest about uncertainty
Note: Examples and details vary per use case; I keep this section high-level until specific case studies are publishable.
Highlights
- •Reasoning over messy, incomplete inputs
- •Useful outputs > buzzwords
- •Systems mindset: failure modes, monitoring, iteration
Next step
Want to build something like this — or pressure test your architecture?