AIActive

AI Applications for the Real World

AI that supports decisions instead of chasing hype.

Case study

Problem

AI is easy to demo and hard to trust. I focus on AI features that actually help people make decisions or automate safe tasks — with clear boundaries, fallbacks and observability.

Constraints

  • Inputs are messy: incomplete data, ambiguity, and humans changing their mind
  • AI outputs must be safe to act on (or clearly marked as suggestions)
  • Latency and cost matter in real products
  • Failure must degrade gracefully — not quietly do the wrong thing

Approach

  • Use AI where it's strongest: classification, extraction, summarization, reasoning support
  • Keep deterministic systems deterministic; AI is an assistant, not the foundation
  • Design for uncertainty: confidence, guardrails, and escalation paths
  • Instrument everything: traces, evaluation sets, feedback loops, regression checks

Architecture

  • Pipeline: input → normalization → AI step(s) → validation → action/suggestion
  • Guardrails: schema validation, allowlists, rate limits, and safe defaults
  • Observability: logs + metrics per step, plus 'why did it decide this?' context
  • Iteration: small deployable improvements, monitored over time

Outcomes

  • AI features that feel helpful instead of risky
  • Systems that can be monitored, tested and improved continuously
  • A reusable approach for adding AI into products without losing trust

Lessons learned

  • If it can't be tested and observed, it's not done
  • Guardrails aren't optional — they are the product
  • The best AI UX is calm: clear, bounded, and honest about uncertainty
Note: Examples and details vary per use case; I keep this section high-level until specific case studies are publishable.

Highlights

  • Reasoning over messy, incomplete inputs
  • Useful outputs > buzzwords
  • Systems mindset: failure modes, monitoring, iteration

Next step

Want to build something like this — or pressure test your architecture?